Solutions Column: Forbes.com
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
To share this article, click
one of these service icons:
This article was originally published at Forbes.com in March 2008
by John Boesel
Since 1973, when President Nixon announced
”Project Independence” in response to the Arab Oil Embargo, the
nation’s dependence on imported oil has steadily increased. Why has
that happened? How can a call to action by arguably the world’s most
important person, and one effectively repeated by everyone one of his
successors, be ignored and completely ineffective? Is it a technical
or policy problem that we have?
As CEO of CALSTART,
an organization that works with a wide array of companies developing
and selling clean and energy efficient transportation technologies, I
have an abundance of optimism about what can be done, cost-effectively,
from a technical perspective to not only significantly cut our
dependence on oil but also reduce transportation related greenhouse gas
emissions.
What has been lacking in the past is a
true national will to direct engineering talent toward fuel efficiency
and substitution. With the absence of political leadership on this
topic, the nation’s best automotive engineers have often focused on how
to deliver more creature comforts or improve acceleration. A study by
Professor John Heywood at MIT has developed a mathematical formula to
analyze what can be done if we place greater emphasis on reducing fuel
consumption. Within 30 years, even without a breakthrough in fuel
technology or energy storage, he says we could cut our oil consumption
in half if public policy directs engineering toward reducing fuel
consumption.
At CALSTART we are working closely
with companies who are developing promising products and services in
the following areas: next generation biofuels, fuel cells, advanced
batteries, more efficient internal combustion engines, electrified
components, innovative fuel retail strategies, and light-weight materials. With the increase in the price of oil, we are now seeing an
improving business case for many of these technologies and systems.
This important mark mechanism has helped draw the attention of the
investment community to the clean transportation technology sector.
However, if we are to really make a difference this time, we cannot
rely on market signals alone. We will need strong, long-term,
intelligent public policy to move our transportation system in the
right direction.
Under the state’s current
political leadership much has been done in California to move us in the
right direction. The passage of the new federal fuel economy bill in
2007 was a small but good step in the right direction. In developing
the nation’s first ever climate policy, much more can and should be
done. Congress also will have a tremendous opportunity when it renews
the federal transportation reauthorization bill. If bold and decisive
policy is set forth in these areas, we will see significant
advancements in technology to cut oil use and greenhouse gas
emissions.
Our engineers are up for the
challenge much as they were when President Kennedy issued his race to
the moon challenge in 1961. We’re starting to see tremendous
innovation occur. For it to be sustained, we will need better public
policies.
John Boesel
President and CEO
CALSTART